Friday, January 07, 2005
Definition
AP Poll: Americans Ambivalent About Bush
I think the headline of this article is misleading. If the American public were in fact a singular entity, then yes, being divided into two camps regarding a topic would make it "ambivalent"--or perhaps schizophrenic. But Americans as individuals are not "ambivalent" about George W. Bush, at least not as a rule. When 49% of the people approve of someone and say things like "I very strongly support what he's been doing," and the other 49% disapprove and prompt jokes like last night's on Will & Grace, when a staffer told Will there was a catastrophe and Will responded, without thinking, "He got elected. We need to get over it," that's not "ambivalence."
The headline should speak the truth: "Americans deeply divided over Bush." It may be less pleasant, but that's the reality. AP, of all organizations, should be more interested in getting it right than playing nice.
I think the headline of this article is misleading. If the American public were in fact a singular entity, then yes, being divided into two camps regarding a topic would make it "ambivalent"--or perhaps schizophrenic. But Americans as individuals are not "ambivalent" about George W. Bush, at least not as a rule. When 49% of the people approve of someone and say things like "I very strongly support what he's been doing," and the other 49% disapprove and prompt jokes like last night's on Will & Grace, when a staffer told Will there was a catastrophe and Will responded, without thinking, "He got elected. We need to get over it," that's not "ambivalence."
The headline should speak the truth: "Americans deeply divided over Bush." It may be less pleasant, but that's the reality. AP, of all organizations, should be more interested in getting it right than playing nice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment